Compare

Polfence vs Zscaler

Enterprise SSE / SASE (ZPA, ZIA) · Zscaler Inc., San Jose, United States

Zscaler is the enterprise reference for security service edge. ZPA and ZIA cover private access, web security, inspection, DLP and much more, backed by a global cloud and a large partner ecosystem. Large organisations with dedicated security teams buy it for that breadth.

Polfence is not trying to be Zscaler. It is a focused EU platform for organisations that need Zero Trust access, secure connectivity, DNS and monitoring with the compliance paperwork done, at a price a mid-sized company can approve without a procurement cycle. Everything runs in the EU under an EU-owned company, and it can be set up in an afternoon by the same person who runs the network.

Feature by feature

Reviewed September 2026. Zscaler details are taken from public documentation; plans and features change, so confirm with the vendor before you decide.

CapabilityPolfenceZscaler
EU data residency, EU-owned vendor
Yes

Polish company, hosted in Paris and Amsterdam

Partial

US company; EU data centres available

GDPR DPA included
Yes

Available in the dashboard

Partial

Negotiated in the enterprise contract

NIS2 readiness report
Yes

Article 21 assessment + printable report

Check vendor

Compliance mappings via services; not self-service

ZTNA, per-app least privilege
Yes
Yes

ZPA

Device posture checks
Yes

Disk encryption, firewall, screen lock, OS version

Yes
Just-in-time access
Yes

Request, approve, time-boxed grant

Check vendor

Check vendor

SSO + SCIM provisioning
Yes

OIDC (Entra ID, Google, Okta) + SCIM 2.0

Yes
DPI-resistant tunnel
Yes

Perimeter engine, obfuscated WireGuard

Check vendor
Site-to-site router configs (plain WireGuard)
Yes

UniFi, MikroTik, pfSense, OPNsense, OpenWrt

Partial

App and Branch Connectors; no plain WireGuard export

DNS filtering resolver
Yes

Polfence Shield, DoH, EU upstream

Yes

ZIA DNS control

Authoritative DNS + zone kill switch
Yes
No
Dynamic DNS (dyndns2)
Yes
No
Remote desktop
Yes

Polfence Connect, consent-gated

Partial

Privileged Remote Access add-on

Uptime monitors + public status pages
Yes

HTTP/TCP/DNS, public /s/ pages, badge

Partial

ZDX experience monitoring; no public status pages

Public API
Yes

REST v1 + OpenAPI

Yes
Audit trail + signed webhooks
Yes

HMAC-signed, Slack/Teams/JSON, CSV export

Yes

Log streaming to SIEM

Pricing modelFlat plan per account: Free, Pro and Business monthly. Enterprise on request.Enterprise quote; per user, bundled editions

available partly or with limits not offered unsure, check vendor— not applicable

Why teams switch to Polfence

  • Self-service setup and transparent flat pricing instead of a quote and a deployment project.
  • EU-owned vendor with EU-only processing and a DPA in the dashboard.
  • A NIS2 Article 21 self-assessment and report without a services engagement.
  • Plain WireGuard configs for existing routers and a dyndns2 endpoint.
  • Consent-gated remote desktop, DNS hosting and status pages included.

Where Zscaler is stronger

  • Enterprise breadth Polfence does not have: full web proxy with TLS inspection, sandboxing, DLP, CASB, browser isolation.
  • A global cloud with many more points of presence and enterprise SLAs.
  • Deep integrations with enterprise IdPs, EDR, SIEM and ITSM vendors.
  • Professional services and a large certified partner network.

Try it next to Zscaler.

The free plan needs no card. Set up a network, a Shield profile and a monitor in an afternoon and compare for yourself.

Polfence vs Zscaler · Polfence