Compare

Polfence vs Cloudflare Zero Trust

SASE platform (Access, Gateway, WARP) · Cloudflare Inc., San Francisco, United States

Cloudflare Zero Trust sits on one of the largest edges in the world. Access, Gateway and WARP are mature, the free tier is generous, and if you already terminate traffic at Cloudflare the integration is natural. For scale and global reach it is the reference point.

Polfence is the smaller, European alternative. It runs entirely in the EU under an EU-owned company, so there is no data localisation add-on to buy and no CLOUD Act question to answer. It adds things Cloudflare does not focus on, such as dyndns2 dynamic DNS, plain WireGuard router configs, an obfuscated tunnel, consent-gated remote desktop and public status pages, and it prices as a flat plan.

Feature by feature

Reviewed September 2026. Cloudflare Zero Trust details are taken from public documentation; plans and features change, so confirm with the vendor before you decide.

CapabilityPolfenceCloudflare Zero Trust
EU data residency, EU-owned vendor
Yes

Polish company, hosted in Paris and Amsterdam

Partial

US company; EU data localisation available as an add-on

GDPR DPA included
Yes

Available in the dashboard

Yes

Published DPA

NIS2 readiness report
Yes

Article 21 assessment + printable report

No
ZTNA, per-app least privilege
Yes
Yes
Device posture checks
Yes

Disk encryption, firewall, screen lock, OS version

Yes
Just-in-time access
Yes

Request, approve, time-boxed grant

Partial

Temporary authentication with an approver flow in Access policies

SSO + SCIM provisioning
Yes

OIDC (Entra ID, Google, Okta) + SCIM 2.0

Yes
DPI-resistant tunnel
Yes

Perimeter engine, obfuscated WireGuard

Check vendor

WARP over WireGuard or MASQUE; not marketed as obfuscation

Site-to-site router configs (plain WireGuard)
Yes

UniFi, MikroTik, pfSense, OPNsense, OpenWrt

Partial

Magic WAN and WARP Connector; no plain WireGuard export

DNS filtering resolver
Yes

Polfence Shield, DoH, EU upstream

Yes

Gateway DNS policies

Authoritative DNS + zone kill switch
Yes
Partial

Authoritative DNS; no one-click zone kill switch

Dynamic DNS (dyndns2)
Yes
Partial

Via API scripts; no dyndns2 endpoint

Remote desktop
Yes

Polfence Connect, consent-gated

Partial

Browser RDP to servers through Access

Uptime monitors + public status pages
Yes

HTTP/TCP/DNS, public /s/ pages, badge

Partial

Health checks for load balancing; no public status pages

Public API
Yes

REST v1 + OpenAPI

Yes
Audit trail + signed webhooks
Yes

HMAC-signed, Slack/Teams/JSON, CSV export

Yes

Logpush to SIEM

Pricing modelFlat plan per account: Free, Pro and Business monthly. Enterprise on request.Free up to a user cap; then per user, plus add-ons

available partly or with limits not offered unsure, check vendor— not applicable

Why teams switch to Polfence

  • EU-only processing under an EU-owned vendor, without a localisation add-on.
  • NIS2 readiness assessment and report built into the product.
  • dyndns2 dynamic DNS and plain WireGuard configs for routers.
  • Consent-gated remote desktop for IT support.
  • Public status pages and monitors without a separate product.
  • A single flat plan instead of per-user pricing and add-ons.

Where Cloudflare Zero Trust is stronger

  • A global anycast edge with far more points of presence; latency and capacity Polfence does not match.
  • A much wider SASE scope: secure web gateway with TLS inspection, CASB, DLP, browser isolation, email security.
  • Tight integration with Cloudflare's CDN, WAF, Workers and R2 if you already use them.
  • A larger free tier for small teams.

Try it next to Cloudflare Zero Trust.

The free plan needs no card. Set up a network, a Shield profile and a monitor in an afternoon and compare for yourself.

Polfence vs Cloudflare Zero Trust · Polfence